LOCI Catcheswhat you, and coding agentsmiss.

Pre-run execution prediction for compiled software.

Plan, code, test, fix, repeat — every loop costs a cycle.

LOCI predicts inside the loop, so you fix before it costs you.

PerformancePowerMemorySystem Behavior

Powered by AI PhysicsiAI Physics — deterministic models trained on real-world workloads and platforms. They predict how your compiled code actually runs — timing, energy, memory, software behavior — from the binary, not the source, and generalize to binaries they have never seen — up to R² = 0.96 on unseen code.

Works withClaude Code·GitHub·MCP

Trusted by partners, customers & investors

Microsoft
Arm
Infineon
STMicroelectronics
NVIDIA Inception Program
Deutsche Telekom · T-Systems
NTT Data
Porsche SE
Toyota Tsusho
Maniv Mobility
FM Capital
UL
Microsoft
Arm
Infineon
STMicroelectronics
NVIDIA Inception Program
Deutsche Telekom · T-Systems
NTT Data
Porsche SE
Toyota Tsusho
Maniv Mobility
FM Capital
UL
plan→ predict → fix·code→ predict → fix·then test

Fewer loops. Higher first-pass quality.

Deadlines, power, memory, paths — the loop tells you a cycle too late.

LOCI predicts at /plan, at code write, in CI/CD. Fix before the cycle is spent.

Fewer iterations
6 caught pre-merge — found before the loop spent a cycle
Less agent back-and-forth
21 of 27 auto-verified — the agent stopped asking you to check
Higher first-pass quality
77% first-pass clean — landed right the first time

Testing still has the final word. It just stops being where you find out.

loci-cockpit · BLE_TI live
LOCI6 catches · 27 checks · 69 fns

CONTRACT ENVELOPE · cost vs budget

Deadline · llProcessCentral✗ 107%
Power · llProcessCentral⚠ 93%
Stack · app task⚠ 96%

│ budget · bars past it are over

PREVENTED6 caught pre-merge · 77% first-pass clean
BABYSITTING≈8 hrs saved · 21/27 auto-verified
⚠ powerNotifyCb +164.7% (266 → 704 ns) — caught pre-merge

Real measured session · BLE_TI on TI CC2674P10

Static analysis stops at the source. A profiler stops at the run you took. Neither tells you what will happen.

Static analysisbefore · sourceCoding agentbefore · sourceProfilersafter runTesting / Simafter runObservabilityafter runLOCIbefore · binary
Timing
Execution time, per function and block—————●
Worst-case path (WCET), not observed average—————●
Memory
Worst-case stack depth—————●
Heap and buffer pressure—————●
Power
Energy per call, power draw—————●
Method
Control flow and call-graph reach●————●
Symbolic execution, with time——————

Surface the risks before you spend the time.

One engine · every domain

See LOCI across different engineering domains.

Same execution-aware guardian. Same interaction. Pick a domain.

Your Graviton services, measured on real silicon.

Natively-compiled services on AWS Graviton, measured in the units your cloud team lives in — p99, $/request, cost & carbon.

  • NativeAOT .NET, Go, Rust, C/C++ — measured per function
  • Caught pre-merge by the same guardian
  • No instrumentation — runs from the binary
App
LOCI · pre-merge check · authz.goaarch64 live
USERship the payment-auth endpoint on Graviton.
01Claude Code plans → new encoder + cipher per request
LOCIFLAG · OUT OF ENVELOPEcaught pre-merge
p99 18× over the latency budget
Passed every unit test — alloc/free dominates on real silicon.
02Claude Code reverts → pool the encoder, reuse the cipher → re-measure OK
On Graviton · p99 −34% · ≈ −$3.9k/mo

Illustrative · grounded in documented patterns — gRPC #6619 · OpenSSL #22189

In CI

Same gate. Five different ways to be wrong.

Each domain leans on a different gate, and every gate here is green. None of these is visible in the source.

Automotive · ECU

agent: “simplify the CAN frame parser”

unit tests ✓ · review ✓ · HIL slot next week

handler worst case runs past the frame window

WCET exceeds the arrival period — frames dropped under burst, not under test

blocked

Security · crypto

agent: “tighter constant-time compare on the auth path”

sast ✓ · sca ✓ · crypto review ✓

constant-time property lost

timing variance correlates with secret-bit count · CWE-208 pattern

blocked

Cloud · service

agent: “cleaner buffer handling in the encrypt path”

load test green at tested concurrency

allocation introduced on the hot path

per-request alloc/free moves p99 well past its budget under load

blocked

Robotics · control

agent: “offload the filter to the accelerator”

simulation ✓ · review ✓

CPU waits on the handoff, buffers held across the wait

control-loop jitter widens and in-flight work is unbounded

pushback

Battery · IoT

agent: “poll the sensor more often for accuracy”

review ✓ · power last measured a release ago

energy per cycle rises against a fixed budget

duty cycle breaches the power envelope before it breaches timing

pushback

Representative patterns, not measured sessions. Each is a mechanism LOCI models — worst-case timing, variance, allocation on a hot path, energy per cycle — on a supported target.

The Engine·AI Physics

AI Physics, a small, fast foundation model for software execution on real silicon.

A small, fast model trained on real-silicon traces. Generalizes to new, unseen binaries at up to R² = 0.96 — catching what source-only LLMs miss.

  • Deterministic

  • Bounded by physicsiEvery prediction is a measurable physical quantity — cycles, ns, energy — checkable by running the binary on real hardware. It can't drift into invented numbers the way free-form text can.

  • Verifiable on hardware

  • Human-on-the-loop

0+patents0 yrsreal-platform trainingReal siliconverified on hardwareNot a GPT wrapper
true vs predicted · held-out real silicon
predicted = measuredtrue mean · measured nspredicted mean
up to R² = 0.96MAPE ≈ 8%held-out

Predicted vs measured on new, unseen binaries · matched to the real eval · up to R² = 0.96 · MAPE ≈ 8%.

Works with the tools your team already uses

  • Platformself-hosted · SaaS
  • GitGitHub · GitLab · Bitbucket
  • AzureDevOps · pipelines
  • AWSMarketplace listing
  • Claude CodeMCP plugin
  • GCC+ Clang · LLVM · MSVC
  • LanguagesC · C++ · Rust · Go · Cython
  • TargetsJetson · Orin · aarch64 · Cortex-M · TriCore
Why trust usSafety-critical DNAFrom automotive · mission-critical

Built to the standards your compliance team already trusts.

8 years shipping into automotive and industrial systems. LOCI inherits the rigor.

ASPICE Level 2

Automotive software process maturity

ISO 26262 / ASIL-B

Functional safety for automotive

ISO 21434

Cybersecurity engineering for road vehicles

Autonomous Vehicles

Production AV programs · ISO 21448 / SOTIF aligned

ISO 27001

Information security management

120+ Patents

Binary analysis & execution modeling

Guard every coding agent decision with execution evidence.

Your coding agents are already shipping decisions. LOCI gives every one — plan, PR, merge — runtime-grade evidence the coding agent and reviewer can act on.

75%

of AI coding agents introduce quality regressions during long-term maintenance.Source