LOCI Catcheswhat coding agentsmiss.

Fast AI thinks ahead

Coding agents write code. LOCI thinks ahead.

LOCI knows what the code will do before it runs.

Performance Power Memory System behavior

Predict Warn Guide

Less babysitting Fewer regressions

Powered by AI PhysicsiAI Physics — deterministic models trained on real-silicon execution traces. They predict how your compiled code actually runs — timing, energy, memory — from the binary, not the source, and generalize to code they’ve never seen (R² = 0.96 on held-out). trained on real-hardware traces

Trusted by partners, customers & investors

Microsoft
Arm
Infineon
STMicroelectronics
NVIDIA Inception Program
Deutsche Telekom · T-Systems
NTT Data
Porsche SE
Toyota Tsusho
Maniv Mobility
FM Capital
UL
Microsoft
Arm
Infineon
STMicroelectronics
NVIDIA Inception Program
Deutsche Telekom · T-Systems
NTT Data
Porsche SE
Toyota Tsusho
Maniv Mobility
FM Capital
UL
Workload
claude-code · ble-gateway live
Execution-Aware GuardianFoundation ModelMCPAgent to Agent

Give your coding agent a second brain.

Coding agents know how to write code. LOCI knows what happens when that code runs.

Predict

What will happen when this code runs?

Slower?More power?More memory?Unexpected system effects?

Warn

Catch regressions before testing and production.

Guide

Help the agent choose a better implementation before merge.

AI writes the code. LOCI predicts the consequences.

Less babysitting. Fewer regressions. Higher first-pass accuracy.

No runtime. No instrumentation. Just a pre-merge verdict.

How it works

Predict the outcome, before you merge.

LOCI sits in the loop with your coding agent — it predicts what the change will do on the target machine, the coding agent fixes it, and you merge with confidence.

Coding Agent

Writes code

LOCI Guardian

Predicts what will happen

  • Slower execution?
  • More power?
  • More memory?
  • System side effects?
  • Breaks team limits?

Coding Agent

Improves the implementation

Merge

with confidence

Why it changes the game

From finding problems late, to fixing them before merge.

Without LOCI

  • AI writes code.
  • Developers test it.
  • Problems are found later.
  • Teams babysit coding agents.

With LOCI

  • AI writes code.
  • LOCI predicts the outcome immediately.
  • The coding agent fixes itself.
  • Teams review less, ship with more confidence.

LOCI turns coding agents from

“I think this code is correct.”“I know how this code will behave.”
Same engine · your stack

You saw the catch. Here it is in the units your team lives in.

Your Graviton services, measured on real silicon.

Native services on Graviton, measured — in the units your cloud team lives in.

  • NativeAOT .NET, Go, Rust, C/C++ on Graviton — measured per function, on real silicon
  • Same measurement, your cloud units — p99, $/request, cost & carbon
  • Pre-merge — the same guardian, caught before it ships
App
LOCI · pre-merge check · authz.goaarch64 live
USERship the payment-auth endpoint on Graviton.
01Claude Code plans → new encoder + cipher per request
LOCIFLAG · OUT OF ENVELOPEcaught pre-merge
p99 18× over the latency budget
Passed every unit test — alloc/free dominates on real silicon.
02Claude Code reverts → pool the encoder, reuse the cipher → re-measure OK
On Graviton · p99 −34% · ≈ −$3.9k/mo

Illustrative · grounded in documented patterns — gRPC #6619 · OpenSSL #22189

NewPre-silicon

Workload-aware execution signals, now for RTL teams.

RTL execution intelligence

Claude Code writes the Verilog. LOCI reviews it against the real workload.

Binary-workload awareness on AI-written RTL — LOCI prices every decision on the customer’s actual workload and turns it into a code-review verdict, before silicon.

  • BIN workload, not synthetic benchmarks
  • No sim re-run per change
  • Fits your verification stack
RTL change
LOCI · pre-merge check · picorv32.vrv32 pre-silicon
USERcut cycles on the PicoRV32 firmware.
01Claude Code proposes → leave 64-bit div/mod to libgcc software emulation
LOCIFLAG · CAUTIONcaught pre-silicon
Software div/mod = 7.4% of ROM
Clean RTL, all tests pass — libgcc emulates 64-bit math; __udivdi3 / __moddi3 dominate.
02Claude Code adjusts RTL → enable HW mul/div (ENABLE_MUL · ENABLE_DIV) → re-measure OK
Measured on workload · −20.4% cycles · 118,923 → 94,679

Real LOCI × PicoRV32 session (2026-05-25). LOCI memory-report flagged the ROM div/mod; cycle deltas measured on the workload — RV32 is not yet a LOCI silicon-timing target.

Independent Validation

LOCI in the loop, not in the way.

An independent validation layer at every stage of the Claude Code agentic loop — plan, write, PR, and merge. It surfaces the catch; it never blocks the flow.

Agent-agnostic · Claude Code · Cursor · Copilot

loci · agent loop live
Claude Codeplan · write · pr · merge
PLANLOCI preflight PASS
WRITELOCI post-edit CAUTION
PRLOCI diff review PASS
MERGELOCI quality regression PASS
Validated at every gate — the ⚠ caution surfaces, the loop never stops.
The Engine·AI Physics

AI Physics, a small, fast foundation model for software execution on real silicon.

A small, fast model trained on real-silicon traces. Generalizes to unseen code at R² = 0.96 — catching what source-only LLMs miss.

  • Deterministic

  • Bounded by physicsiEvery prediction is a measurable physical quantity — cycles, ns, energy — checkable by running the binary on real hardware. It can't drift into invented numbers the way free-form text can.

  • Verifiable on hardware

  • Human-on-the-loop

~220×cheaper per query vs frontier LLMs120+patents6 yrsreal-platform trainingNot a GPT wrapper
lclm · held-out code real silicon
predicted = measuredmeasured ns · real siliconpredicted ns
R² = 0.96MAPE ≈ 8%held-out

Illustrative — the fit shape of R² = 0.96 on held-out code, not the raw eval points.

Why trust usSafety-critical DNAFrom automotive · mission-critical

Built to the standards your compliance team already trusts.

8 years shipping into automotive and industrial systems. LOCI inherits the rigor.

ASPICE Level 2

Automotive software process maturity

ISO 26262 / ASIL-B

Functional safety for automotive

ISO 21434

Cybersecurity engineering for road vehicles

Autonomous Vehicles

Production AV programs · ISO 21448 / SOTIF aligned

ISO 27001

Information security management

120+ Patents

Binary analysis & execution modeling

Works with the tools your team already uses

  • Platformself-hosted · SaaS
  • GitGitHub · GitLab · Bitbucket
  • AzureDevOps · pipelines
  • AWSMarketplace listing
  • Claude CodeMCP plugin
  • CopilotCLI hook · skills
  • GCC+ Clang · LLVM · MSVC
Specialist vs Frontier

Could you ask a frontier LLM instead?

You could — at ~220× the cost, predicting from patterns, not execution.

Frontier LLM·source code only
Trained on
Source code
Predicts from
Patterns
Accuracy
Prediction drift
Cost per query
~220× more
LOCI·trained on execution
Trained on
Real hardware traces
Predicts from
Execution behavior
Accuracy
Trace-validated
Cost per query
Small specialist · efficient

Small specialist + real execution > frontier LLM + source code.

Guard every coding agent decision with execution evidence.

Your coding agents are already shipping decisions. LOCI gives every one — plan, PR, merge — runtime-grade evidence the coding agent and reviewer can act on.

75%

of AI coding agents introduce quality regressions during long-term maintenance.Source